UN Climate Talks Focus on Extreme Weather, CO2 and Global Governance

Post Categories: Canada
Susanne Posel | Tuesday, December 4, 2012, 15:03 Beijing

Northern California is taking the alarmist view of rising sea levels seriously as the government estimates that 1/3rd of a million residents are threatened in the San Francisco Bay/Delta region. The cost of building infrastructure to secure them is $60 billion. It is suggested that the power station, water-treatment plants, roads, buildings and airports are most vulnerable to the effects of a super el Nino storm.

Extreme storms, after Sandy’s destruction across the east coast, are the alarmist’s new cry as proof that man-made climate change is real. While rising seas are still part of the fear-mongering plan, there is a direct trend toward demanding that greenhouse gas emissions be reduced to stave off potential superstorms in the future.

US governmental investment in clean energy technologies is becoming a cry for efficiency to help protect against the rath of Mother Nature.

The UN World Meteorological Organization (WMO) stated in a recent press statement that they expect the la Nina to come early this year, which is proof that there are unprecedented changes in the weather. WMO claims that the Artic melting of sea ice and recent weather extremes correlate.

According to the statement: “January-October 2012 has been the ninth warmest such period since records began in 1850. The global land and ocean surface temperature for the period was about 0.45°C (0.81°F) above the corresponding 1961–1990 average of 14.2°C.”

Predicting more meteorological devastation, the WMO claim that Arctic sea melt “reached its lowest” point which is the data recorded by satellites. WMO will release a report entitled “2001-2010: Decade of Extremes” next month. This document was produced in part by the UN, eco-fascist scientists and international agencies supporting the myth of man-made climate change.

 

 

Weather patterns unusual to norms recorded in history and blamed on global warming are:

• Heat waves
• Droughts
• Floods
• Snow and extreme cold
• Super hurricanes and cyclones

Michael Jarraud, president of the WMO stated: “The extent of Arctic sea ice reached a new record low. The alarming rate of its melt this year highlighted the far-reaching changes taking place on Earth’s oceans and biosphere. Climate change is taking place before our eyes and will continue to do so as a result of the concentrations of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere, which have risen constantly and again reached new records.”

According to a press release, at the University of Alabama, Spencer said: “The satellite observations suggest there is much more energy lost to space during and after warming than the climate models show. There is a huge discrepancy between the data and the forecasts that is especially big over the oceans.”

Researchers with GEOMAR have surmised that man-made bromine and chlorine are being expelled by volcanoes into the atmosphere in two to three times the quantity produced by man. Because volcanic eruptions can be carried across the globe, these elemental explosions could lead to ozone layer depletion as well as impact the Arctic and Antarctic.

According to a study conducted by the International Energy Agency in 2011, the Arctic is currently cooling and the effects brought on by sulfuric aerosols would cause more damage to the planet’s natural ability to cycle through its temperature fluxuations.

The focus of solar geoengineering is in the Arctic where the alarmists theorize that the necessity is the greatest to combat the melting of the ice-sheets. However, their disregard for natural cycles of the earth and the cyclical flow of melting and refreezing of these ice-sheets are the real danger to our planet’s normal seasonal cycles.

When discussing Arctic ice melt, the alarmists conveniently forget to mention solar radiation meanagement schemes (i.e. solar geoengineering). Solar geoengineering (SGE) costs an estimated $5 billion annually and is an endeavor to mimic the effects of a volcanic eruption with the use of sulfuric aerosols dispensed into the atmosphere.

This scheme would not reduce CO2 levels, yet alter the temperature and precipitation levels across the globe.

Justifying the need for a cooling effect, David Keith, director of the Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment and Economy is pushing the releasing of nanotechnology with sulfuric aerosols into the Earth’s atmosphere to reflect sunlight back out into space. Keith manages the million-dollar geoengineering research that is funded by Bill Gates and the Fund for Innovative Climate and Energy Research.

Solar engineering will directly amplify specific areas of study as the have chosen sulfuric dust the mimics the emissions of volcanoes. An intended consequences of solar geoengineering is thewhitening of our skies because of the nano particles being released to reflect sunlight. Sulfate aerosols cause whiter daytime skies and sunset to glow brighter.

Scientists supporting the alarmist claims of man-made climate change use computer models that make wild-predictions for 2050 based on current assertions of misconstrued Arctic ice melt.

Soros-funded propaganda media decries House Representative Lamar Smith for being outspoken about the truth of climate change being a hoax. Smith has recently been nominated to the chair position of the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology — a body with jurisdiction over many laboratories, NASA, the National Science Foundation, and the National Weather Service.

Smith has stated in the past that scientists and journalists must be “determined to advance the idea of human-made global warming” without providing actual scientific data that is irrefutable.

Smith said: “We now know that prominent scientists were so determined to advance the idea of human-made global warming that they worked together to hide contradictory temperature data. But for two weeks, none of the networks gave the scandal any coverage on their evening news programs.

And when they finally did cover it, their reporting was largely slanted in favor of global warming alarmists. The networks have shown a steady pattern of bias on climate change. During a six-month period, four out of five network news reports failed to acknowledge any dissenting opinions about global warming, according to a Business and Media Institute study. The networks should tell Americans the truth, rather than hide the facts.”

 

The UN Climate Change Conference (UNCCC) in Qatar, Saudi Arabia provides a forum for the alarmists and eco-fascists to gather and conspire to convince the sovereign nations of the world that they must adhere to UN mandates on climate change or face international mandates.

 

Specific to this conference is the goal of creating a global climate mandate that will be internationally implemented by 2020. To expedite a global action to mitigate the effects of man on the climate, there is a demand for lower greenhouse emissions for the benefit of the biodiversity of the planet and to ensure than sustainability is protected.

The UN Framework Convention on Climate Change states that: “A faster response to climate change is necessary and possible, both in terms of the international policy response and increasing action at national and sub-national policy level and from global business. Doha must make sure the response is accelerated.”

 

The WMO was founded by the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 1994 to survey scientific studies and corroborate information that supported their agenda with concern to global warming.

It was agreed that there must be an “international consensus that climate change was human-induced.”

Developed nations such as the US and China are recognized as having more of an obligation to reduce CO2 emissions wherein the developing countries are given a reduction in responsibility because of the estimated proportionality.

The WMO is designed to:

  •  Monitor developed countries with regard to contributions to global greenhouse emissions
  • Estimate emissions released into the atmosphere by all developing nations
  • Identify the origination of global CO2 emissions in developing countries and use propaganda to coerce these trends to stop

The Brookings Institute, a globalist-controlled think-tank, explains that President Obama “has negotiated an intergovernmental agreement designed to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from the transportation sector.

The president also pledged specific emission reduction targets as part of the American bargaining position at Copenhagen, though the recent summit produced very modest agreements.

At the same time, a wide range of state and local government climate policies continue to be adopted and many are now being implemented.”

 

Climate change was created by the Club of Rome who stated that “in searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill.

All these dangers are caused by human intervention and thus the real enemy, then, is humanity itself believed humanity requires a common motivation, namely a common adversary in order to realize world government.

It does not matter if this common enemy is a real one or one invented for the purpose.”

 

Susanne Posel, Occupy Corporatism

Print this entry

Related articles:

Add Comments

  • Name (required)
  • Mail (required)
1+7= (required)